anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
http://sci-humor.blogspot.com/2012/10/blog-post_24.html

"В начале не было ничего, только полная симметрия, и свободная калибровка летала над водами.

Потом отделил Бог целый спин от полуцелого, и повелел целому спину подчиняться статистике Бозе, а полуцелому статистике Ферми. И увидел он, что это хорошо.[...]"

I've imported it into LJ: http://sci-humour.livejournal.com/
anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
I wonder whether anyone who reads this blog has any particular positive recommendation. Or whether people have any (positive or negative) experiences with the Boston Language Institute (perhaps with some other language, if not with Chinese)...
anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
October 6 and October 16

details )
anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
Мне известны две теории про такси из аэропорта Шереметьево.

1) Не меньше 100 долларов и опасно для жизни.

2) Есть официальная очередь на такси, и там безопасно и заранее договариваешься о цене, обычно в пределах 35 доллаов.

Что из этого правда?
anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
The "primary" NASA site for monitoring MN4 asteroid silently dropped the number of observations from 176 to 118 and also dropped the impact probability from 2% to 0.002%. I can't find a single "secondary" site which noticed this yet, although they did follow every slight increase in this probability before.

Besides wondering what's going on here, this story is interesting from the angle of studying information creation and propagation. First of all, even the drastic decrease in probability is not too welcome by people who write about this, because it's boring, and so this is not reported quickly, while even a slight increase is of interest (anticipation of more to come).

Now why on Earth NASA suddenly kicked out 58 observation points (a third), and why there is still no commentary at all (it was quite a few hours) ? Fake, unreliable, statistically incorrect results ? Good results dropped by mistake ? (And I suppose one can produce at least a dozen juicy conspiracy theories out of this.)

UPDATE: The Wikipedia article now reports this, and explains that precovered data were used to obtain the corrected estimates. So asteroid-wise the story has probably lost the significance. The Wikipedia article notes that the choice of 118 observations remains unexplained (probably one of those statistical things, trust them or not).

UPDATE #2. Someone at Slashdot offers a reasonable explanation: "Now, because they have ruled out an impact in 2029, some of the observations actually don't contribute to determining whether an impact will occur on the other, later dates (2037, 2044, etc). There have been hundreds of observations but the only ones relevant to the current potential impacts are counted on that NASA page." (Also a virtually unlimited quantity of conspiracy theories in that Slashdot thread, of course :-) )
anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
This is probably a good place to keep track of the status of asteroid 2004 MN4.

Current data: Torino impact hazard scale: 4 (for impact on Friday, April 13, 2029), probability of impact about 2%, impact energy equivalent: 1400 megatons of TNT.
anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
I wanted to find out the exact time of winter solstice in 2012 :-)

US Naval Observatory says here that it is Dec.21, 11:11 universal time, i.e. 6:11am Eastern Standard Time.


Profile

anhinga_anhinga: (Default)
anhinga_anhinga

July 2021

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 03:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios