Presumably, the Universe might be larger than what we usually think it is :-)
Basically, we usually refer to something described by the Big Bang model (or by some alternative models) as the Universe; this is what is being moved from the center.
The correct procedure is, of course, to stop calling this object "the Universe", and call it something like "the Astrophysical Space" :-) Given that the Astrophysical Space might be not very universal, we probably should not call it the Universe any longer :-)
The "simulation argument" as presented has holes in some important places. One of them is that the author glosses over the way the simulator decides how many details to simulate (and how to simulate them). This point is all handwaving and little substance, imho.
А иначе разговор напоминает спор древних греческих философов о том, какая материя первична: вода или огонь. Что может современная философия ответить на такой вопрос? Не даёт ответа, хихикает за углом.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 07:52 am (UTC)Basically, we usually refer to something described by the Big Bang model (or by some alternative models) as the Universe; this is what is being moved from the center.
The correct procedure is, of course, to stop calling this object "the Universe", and call it something like "the Astrophysical Space" :-) Given that the Astrophysical Space might be not very universal, we probably should not call it the Universe any longer :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 08:59 pm (UTC)The "simulation argument" as presented has holes in some important places. One of them is that the author glosses over the way the simulator decides how many details to simulate (and how to simulate them). This point is all handwaving and little substance, imho.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 09:14 pm (UTC):-) Would not this be too radical ? :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-03 02:22 am (UTC)