The "simulation argument" as presented has holes in some important places. One of them is that the author glosses over the way the simulator decides how many details to simulate (and how to simulate them). This point is all handwaving and little substance, imho.
А иначе разговор напоминает спор древних греческих философов о том, какая материя первична: вода или огонь. Что может современная философия ответить на такой вопрос? Не даёт ответа, хихикает за углом.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 08:59 pm (UTC)The "simulation argument" as presented has holes in some important places. One of them is that the author glosses over the way the simulator decides how many details to simulate (and how to simulate them). This point is all handwaving and little substance, imho.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 09:14 pm (UTC):-) Would not this be too radical ? :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-03 02:22 am (UTC)